President Emmerson Mnangagwa has reportedly placed his son, Major Sean Mnangagwa, at the heart of his security apparatus in what insiders describe as a carefully orchestrated plan to prepare him for eventual succession. Sources within Zimbabwe’s military intelligence have told ZimEye that Sean, who serves in the elite Presidential Guard, is being groomed to understand the mechanisms of power, positioning him as a likely heir to the presidency.
The Presidential Guard, a highly strategic battalion, is tasked with safeguarding the President and ensuring the security of Zimbabwe’s political establishment. While it is customary for officers from this unit to serve close to the Head of State, Sean’s role is seen as exceptional. Observers note that his dual position—as both a member of the Guard and the President’s son—creates a complex overlap of family loyalty and state responsibility, raising questions about potential conflicts of interest and the consolidation of power within a single family.
Military insiders allege that plans are underway to promote Sean to a senior rank, potentially brigadier or general, giving him command over the Guard. Such a move would secure his influence within the military hierarchy and bolster his credentials as a viable successor. Analysts say this development mirrors patterns seen across the continent, where leaders have groomed family members through strategic placements in military and security structures.
Since 2023, Sean has accompanied President Mnangagwa on most official trips, often taking charge of security on domestic, regional, and international missions. His presence on these engagements is viewed as more than ceremonial; it is seen as a form of apprenticeship in high-level governance and diplomacy. This week, Sean was part of the delegation accompanying Mnangagwa to the Vatican, further underscoring perceptions that the President is intentionally exposing his son to the complexities of global diplomacy and statecraft.
Beyond his official duties, Sean and his twin brother, Collins, have reportedly been linked to business dealings involving individuals close to the Mnangagwa administration. Sources suggest the brothers operate private offices monitored by state security, where they screen investors seeking access to the President. Allegedly, some businesspeople are required to pay fees to gain an audience, prompting concerns about the emergence of a parallel power structure centered around the First Family. One controversial tycoon, Kuda Tagwirei, is said to have close connections to these operations.
Political analysts interpret these moves as a deliberate strategy to ensure dynastic continuity. “What we are witnessing is a calculated attempt to merge state security with family interests,” one analyst told ZimEye. “By positioning his son within the Presidential Guard and granting him exposure to international affairs, Mnangagwa is effectively preparing him for eventual leadership.” This approach mirrors the political trajectories of several African leaders who have sought to entrench their children within military and political institutions, blending familial influence with state authority.
Critics also point to the broader political implications of Mnangagwa’s administration. His flagship “Vision 2030” initiative, intended to propel Zimbabwe toward upper middle-income status, is increasingly viewed through a political lens. Some opposition figures argue that the policy may serve dual purposes: economic development on paper, but also a mechanism to delay genuine electoral contests. By extending his tenure under the guise of implementing long-term national strategies, Mnangagwa may be creating a runway for Sean to gain the experience and legitimacy necessary to step seamlessly into a leadership role.
The consolidation of power within the Presidential Guard and the apparent entwinement of family members in state and business affairs has sparked debate about governance and transparency. Observers warn that the blurring of public service and private interests could have long-term consequences for Zimbabwe’s political stability. The prospect of a dynastic succession—while not officially acknowledged—raises questions about accountability, meritocracy, and the future of democratic processes in the country.
Attempts to reach presidential spokesperson George Charamba for comment on these developments were unsuccessful, leaving the allegations and analyses unchallenged by official sources. As Zimbabwe navigates a complex political landscape, the positioning of Major Sean Mnangagwa at the intersection of family, military, and state power is likely to remain a subject of scrutiny both domestically and internationally.
Whether this strategic grooming translates into a smooth transfer of authority remains uncertain. What is clear, however, is that the Mnangagwa family is consolidating its presence at the highest levels of the state, intertwining personal loyalty with institutional power, and setting the stage for what many see as a carefully managed political legacy.
Source- ZimEye